In keeping with my long-held love of strange and mysterious babies and presenting them to the world for the scrutiny they deserve (see Exhibit A, Exhibit B, Exhibit C [scroll down to the photos], and, of course, recent Exhibit D), I offer for your enjoyment this superb addition to the cradle. (I do not know what the proper collective noun is for babies, so I submit "cradle of babies" for formal recognition to whatever authority is responsible for making the official determination. Of my earlier submissions, "cuddle of babies" was dismissed as too precious, and "murder of babies" as "already used for crows and too cruel, anyway, you baby-bashing bitch").
My work here — supplying the image — is done. Your work — identifying what this objet de bébé is (other than plain ol' kissable and cuddly) and what it would say if only we cared to listen — is not. So ... get to (baby)stepping!
fresh-baked at 10:24 PMmmm, yummy.
being chided by you is so much better than 6 lame, tame facts.
Offered by: sass on January 31, 2008 3:15 PMIt's...
Offered by: Kyria on January 29, 2008 12:38 PMI thought this would be too plain for anyone to miss. This is obviously a cherub (see http://www.jodiverse.com/2008/01/22/wings_of_desire.html#1986) that isn't getting any.
True, it doesn't have its cute little posterior poised for penetration as the aforementioned winged-dervishes do. No, there's no devilish displaying of the derierre here. But perhaps, nay perchance, that is the very reason for its pouty-faced expression?
The poor little bugger doesn't even have arms to relive itself of its sexual deprivations. What level of dante's Inferno could that be for a cherub who can't fly solo?
Offered by: Ds on January 28, 2008 3:22 PMKissable and cuddly? That baby is totally depressing.
I think it's of Asian origin and created to remind people that even coveted blue eyed, American looking babies will ultimately make the owner depressed and fatigued.
Especially then they have no arms. How needy can a damn baby get??
I can't seem to wrap my head around it's head, which now brings up dirty thoughts of head which, I am sure will just infuriate the ceramic baby defenders of the world.
Offered by: jamied on January 28, 2008 9:06 AMI'm not quite sure, but I'm guessing it's something that an American child might find in a Kinder Surprise. Hey kid, don't be upset - at least it's not a puzzle.
Offered by: Brad on January 27, 2008 10:01 PMSass, my good woman, apparently you didn't need permission, since you went ahead and tagged me without waiting for it to be granted. So for that reason and the one that follows, I say this: "Nyet, pet." Had you brought something to *this* party along with your request, I would have indulged this "tag". But dropping by someone else's party, without making even the simplest of contributions, just to invite someone to yours, is a breach in etiquette that I just cannot permit!
Offered by: Jodi on January 27, 2008 7:59 PM
