they should have just cut his nuts off entirely. sick bastard.
Offered by: alie on August 12, 2002 05:57 PMAnd who says our justice system doesn't work? Pfft.
Offered by: Shawn on August 12, 2002 06:15 PMLorena Bobbitt!
Lorena Bobbitt!
Lorena Bobbitt!
Lorena Bobbitt!
Lorena Bobbitt!
Lorena Bobbitt!
Yes? Did someone call me?
Offered by: LB on August 12, 2002 06:28 PMThe police representative phrased it wrong. If he'd been truthful, he'd have said, "IF the fucking system EVER worked..."
I'm starting to reconsider this whole pacifism thing.
Offered by: revolution9 on August 12, 2002 10:33 PMNormally, I deplore people taking the law into their own hands, and dishing out uneducated justice.
However, in this case, I think the sick fuck who molested those kids deserved what he got, and a whole lot more.
I agree with Alie. They should have cut all his genitals off. If nothing else, it'd remove his desire and ability in one go.
Offered by: Max on August 13, 2002 01:20 AMDid you notice the part in the (original) article that stated the one guy was "already serving a life sentence for......"? If that was the case, how was he able to mete out that justice? Regardless, I'm glad one sicko has met with JUSTICE!
Offered by: Joan on August 13, 2002 01:50 AMagree with alie , dick chopsey should be legalized and should be based upon medical grounds. When i saw my dog getting neutered , how unethical could castration for bigger animals be.
Offered by: ram on August 13, 2002 03:59 AMNeutered and Spayed. Not just the names of pet cats anymore but the way forward.
Nice spatula.
Offered by: D on August 13, 2002 05:15 AMThe problem, as ever, is that you are left in a very uncomfortable situation if you chop someone's dick off and then later discover that they are actually innocent.
An uncomfortable situation for all, in fact.
Offered by: Pete on August 13, 2002 06:26 AMMy brother, a physician, said that if anyone ever touched his kids in an improper way, he would quietly whisk them away to any number of places where he could have time and privacy.
First, he'd perform the obligatory amputation of both arms and legs. Then, he would remove the lower mandible, cutting away the connective tissues between it and the tongue. Next, he'd remove the flesh from the cheeks, swooping up under the eyes and revoving the nose and associated bits of bone, etc. He'd then remove the genitals and graft them onto the underside of the sicko's tongue. The end result would be a still-living human stump with no lower jaw, no lips, no nose and this tongue dangling from the neck cavity with the genitals weighing it down so it would sway in the wind.
The advantage of removing such large amounts of flesh and bone would be that the reconstructive surgery would be extremely difficult, if not impossible due to the lack of existing material to work with. And while the penis could be transplanted back, it most certainly would never function again.
Offered by: Thomas on August 13, 2002 07:44 AM




